In the Interest of A.F.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services brought this suit to terminate the parental rights of Annette Vaughn and Jack Norman Vaughn, Jr. to their three children. The case went to trial before a jury. The charge instructed the jury that the parent-child relationship could be terminated if it was proven by clear and convincing evidence that (1) at least one of two asserted grounds for termination occurred, and (2) termination would be in the best interest of the children. In a series of six questions, the jury was asked whether the parent-child relationship between…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In Re BLDTexas Supreme Court · 2003
4Cited by6 opinions
- in the Interest of S.A.S. and M.I.S., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
- In Re AFTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re SAS, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
- In the Interest of S.A.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- In the Interest of S.K. and A.K., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.