Legal Opinion
in the Interest of S.A.S. and M.I.S.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided August 24, 2006No. 09-05-00451-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
We must decide two issues in this parental-rights termination case. We must determine whether the jury instruction included an unconstitutional ground among several grounds used to terminate the mother’s parental rights and whether the mother was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We overrule both issues raised by the mother and affirm the trial court.
I. BACKGROUND
Angela Ann Schiveley, Appellant, and her husband, Fred William Schiveley, are the parents of S.A.S. and M.I.S., the children who are the subject of this suit. After receipt and investigation of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- in the Interest of N. L. T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- In Re SAS, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
- in the Interest of B.S., D.R.S. and P.W.S., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
- in the Interest of T.W., J.W. and L.W., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2022
- in the Interest of T.W., J.W. and L.W., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2022