Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Interest of S.A.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 2004No. 10-02-345-CVPublished

1DissentTom Gray, C.J.

This is another case in which this court creates and applies an artificial and unnecessary distinction between civil cases generally and a case involving termination of parental rights. The court’s earlier efforts to make such a distinction were rejected. In the Interest of B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 (Tex.2003); In re AN, 113 S.W.3d 355 *172(Tex.2003); In the Interest of A.F., 113 S.W.3d 363 (Tex.2003); In the Interest of K.N.R., 113 S.W.3d 365 (Tex.2003); In the Interest of J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256 (Tex.2002). In doing this not only do we err, but we also do a disservice to the bench and bar by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bradleys' Electric, Inc. v. Cigna Lloyds InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Cengis Tasdemiroglu, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API