Legal Opinion

Beverly O'Hare v. Merck & Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Also Known as Merck, Sharp & Dohme

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1967No. 18581_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*288MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

This products liability case involves a prescription drug manufactured and sold by appellee Merck & Company, Inc. (defendant below). Beverly O’Hare, a Minnesota citizen, filed suit in federal court to recover damages resulting from the development and subsequent surgical removal of a non-specific lesion in the small intestine, also referred to in the record as an ulcer or bowel lesion. She premised her cause of action on the theory that the lesion was caused by her use of HydroDIURIL Ka-50, hereinafter referred to as Ka-50. Between January 17, 1964 and April 15, 1964,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dick v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Mercer v. TheriotSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Upjohn Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. John A. Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Wayne Robbins v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API