Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Ringstaff

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1933No. 6327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge. •

Action by appellee, Ringstaff, to recover damages of appellant, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, for personal injuries.

The questions properly preserved and presented by the record are whether the court erred (1) in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; (2) in excluding from the evidence one of appellant’s rules relating to station agents and train conductors; and (3) in declining to submit to the jury a requested instruction relating to contributory negligence.

Appellee was injured between 1 and 2 o’clock p. m. on June 10-, 192-9', when a freight *483train…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  3. Eaton v. Continental General InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Richard Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Cupac, Inc. v. Mid-West Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API