Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Ringstaff
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge. •
Action by appellee, Ringstaff, to recover damages of appellant, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, for personal injuries.
The questions properly preserved and presented by the record are whether the court erred (1) in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; (2) in excluding from the evidence one of appellant’s rules relating to station agents and train conductors; and (3) in declining to submit to the jury a requested instruction relating to contributory negligence.
Appellee was injured between 1 and 2 o’clock p. m. on June 10-, 192-9', when a freight *483train…
2Cited by10 opinions
- E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Eaton v. Continental General InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Richard Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Cupac, Inc. v. Mid-West Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.