Legal Opinion
Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 4, 1940No. 3500PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court in Rhode Island entered after a jury verdict.
It appears from the evidence that in January, 1933, Ferro Concrete Construction Company, appellant, made a contract with the United States for the construction of a public building at Newport, Rhode Island, and gave the bond required by the Hurd Act. U.S.C.Tit. 40, Section 270, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270. L. Luchini & Son, appellees, as sub-contractors, agreed with the Ferro Company to furnish the stone for the building for the specified sum of $30,000. The stone…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schutz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Dudley v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Kyte v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Owens Bottle-Mach. Co. v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. RingstaffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Menard & Co. Masonry Building Contractors v. Marshall Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- American Title Insurance Company v. East West Financial Corporation, American Title Insurance Company v. East West Financial Corporation, Bay Loan & Investment BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- New England Acceptance Corp. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.