Legal Opinion
HOELZLE v. VENSURE EMPLOYER SERVICES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00473Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN HOELZLE, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, NO. 2:20-cv-00473-KSM v. VENSURE EMPLOYER SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM MARTSON, J. February 18, 2022 Plaintiff Brian Hoelzle claims that he was employed by and wrongfully terminated from Defendant EmployeeMax Acquisition, LLC (“EmployeeMax”). (Doc. No. 1.) He brings the following claims against EmployeeMax and its parent, Vensure Employer Services, Inc. (“Vensure”) (together with EmployeeMax, “Defendants”) in connection with his termination: breach of contract…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.