Legal Opinion

United States v. Coachman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 18, 1985No. Nos. 81-2161, 81-2162PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON.

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, Chief Judge:

Appellants were twice held in criminal contempt, first when they refused to testify during a grand jury investigation, and again when they refused to testify at a trial emanating therefrom. Each appellant asserts that his successive refusals constituted but a single offense, and resultantly that his second contempt conviction offended the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We disagree, and affirm the convictions.

I

Appellants were separately indicted on multiple counts of mail…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. United States v. Patrick Ryan and William SchwenerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. In Re United States Catholic ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Special Grand Jury 89-2District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  5. United States v. Abdullahi FarahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API