Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Ryan and William Schwener

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 16, 1987No. 85-2946, 85-3007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Schwener and Ryan were each placed in civil contempt for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury. Each defendant failed to purge himself of the civil contempt, and each was subsequently convicted of criminal contempt for the same refusal to testify. They now appeal their convictions, arguing, inter alia, that the criminal contempt proceedings against them were barred by the double jeopardy clause and by res judicata. We affirm the defendants’ convictions.

I

The facts as to each defendant are similar. In December, 1983, defendant Schwener pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Segun AshimiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Daniel T. SlaughterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. Kenneth O. LippittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API