Legal Opinion

North American Foreign Trading Corporation v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 10, 1986No. Appeal 85-2271PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that certain imported LCD digital alarm and/or melody watches were properly classified under item 688.36 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and not eligible for duty-free treatment under 19 U.S.C. § 2463(c)(1)(B) and (C). The decision is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the Court of International Trade, North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. United States, 600 F.Supp. 226 (1984), reh’g denied, 607 F.Supp. 1471 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1985).

OPINION

This is not a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Yoshida International, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  5. North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Parkdale International v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Kemet Electronics Corp. v. BarshefskyUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Gpx International Tire Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API