Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Kinsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 2009No. SCBD-5448Published

1Opinion of the Court

2009 OK 31

STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,

v.

LEAH McCASLIN KINSEY, Respondent.

No. SCBD-5448.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 12, 2009.

Loraine Dillinder Farabow, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for complainant.

Leah McCaslin Kinsey, respondent, pro se.

TAYLOR, V.C.J.

¶1 In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, we must decide whether the record is sufficient for our de novo consideration of the alleged professional misconduct, whether professional misconduct is established by clear and convincing evidence, and whether a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ColstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API