Legal Opinion

Stotlar v. Hester

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1978No. 3547PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs purchased residential real property from the Campbells. Alleging that they relied on an appraisal made by Hester and that this appraisal was erroneous, plaintiffs sought damages from Hester and the Campbells. The trial court denied the Campbells’ motion for summary judgment. It granted Hester’s summary judgment motion. Plaintiffs appeal the ruling in favor of Hester. We discuss: (1) appealability of the judgment; (2) negligent representation; (3) third party beneficiary of a contract; and (4) the propriety of summary judgment as to (a) liability and (b)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Hoge v. Farmers Market & Supply Co. of Las Cruces, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Proctor v. WaxlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Altevogt v. BrinkoetterIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cook Consultants, Inc. v. Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Essex v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Garcia v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API