McGuire v. Employment Development Department
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1039Opinion
MARGULIES, J.
Plaintiff Patrick J. McGuire was awarded regular unemployment compensation benefits, but his claim for extended unemployment benefits, filed when his regular benefits were exhausted, was denied. Defendant Employment Development Department (Department) reasoned that McGuire’s earnings during his “base period,” although sufficient to qualify him for regular benefits, were insufficient to satisfy the different eligibility test applied for extended benefits.
The “base period” is a one-year period preceding the claimant’s unemployment. By statute, the commencement date of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2010
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Crescent City v. ReddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017