Legal Opinion
City of Crescent City v. Reddy
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 2017No. A143640PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, P. J.
—Defendant Sarvada Nand Hanumanthu Reddy is the beneficial owner of a motel in Crescent City (the city). In 2013, the city served on Reddy a notice and order to cure various building code violations at the motel. Later that year, after the necessary repairs were not made, Reddy entered into a stipulated judgment in which he committed to cure a number of specified violations within six months. When Reddy again failed to comply, the city filed a successful motion for the appointment of a receiver to oversee compliance.
Reddy contends the trial court (1) erred in overruling…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Santa Monica v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Salas v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Silver v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Villanueva v. City of ColtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City and County of San Francisco v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morgan v. Davidson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cash v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- City of Desert Hot Springs v. ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- County of Sacramento v. RawatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- County of Sacramento v. Rawat CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.