Fast v. Western Transportation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the partial destruction of his floating dock. The dock had been moored to plaintiff’s property on the Willamette River. Directly across the river from plaintiff’s property lies a commercial dock, at which barges are loaded with sawdust. Defendant operates several tugboats, which transport barges to and from the sawdust dock. The river in front of plaintiff’s property is only 400 feet wide. In this constricted stretch of the river the defendant’s tugs often maneuvered barges ranging in length from 150 to 180 feet. In the course of these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Potomac River Ass'n v. Lundeberg Maryland Seamanship School, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Rogers Construction Co. v. Hill, Public Utility CommissionerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Board of Com'rs of Pt. of N. Orl. v. M/V Agelos MichaelDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. Tugs "Cissi Reinauer"District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- State v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- I.C. Marketing, Inc. v. Amos Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005