Legal Opinion
Great American Insurance v. Tugs "Cissi Reinauer"
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 8, 1996No. 94 Civ. 8451 (LBS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the insurer of the Oyster Bend Marina (“the Marina”) and William Lindwall (“Lindwall”), owner of a houseboat, brought this action to recover for property damage caused by tugboats and barges owned and operated by defendant Reinauer Transportation Companies (“Reinauer”). After consideration of the evidence presented at a five-day bench trial, the Court, for the reasons set forth below, finds for defendants on all claims.
BACKGROUND
A THE PROJECT
The Oyster Bend Marina Project (“the Project”) is a real-estate venture located on one of two sharp turns along the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Roane v. Greenwich Swim CommitteeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Schramm v. SpottswoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
- LeBlanc v. ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.