Legal Opinion

Smith v. Haney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1906No. 14,763PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Gove district court; James H. Reeder, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The legislature of 1905 passed a law (Laws 1905, ch. 167) to authorize the county commissioners of Gove county to build and equip a courthouse without a vote of the people. The maximum cost of the building was fixed at $16,000. Provision was made for the expense of the building and equipment by the levy of a special annual tax of not more than three mills on the dollar for not more than four years, the proceeds of these levies to form a separate fund to be known as the “county building fund,” against which warrants were to be drawn for all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Bank v. BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. A. T. & S. F. Railroad v. WoodcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Conklin v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Hawkins v. GregorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API