State Ex Rel. Schneider v. City of Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Prager, J.:
This case involves the constitutionality of tax increment financing of programs designed to redevelop blighted business areas in Kansas cities as authorized by K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 12-1770 et seq. There is no factual dispute. The city of Topeka, by resolution No. 3241, adopted a redevelopment plan for a two-block downtown commercial area. At the same time, the city declared its intent to issue special obligation bonds in the amount of $18,000,000 to finance the redevelopment.
The urban redevelopment act, K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 12-1770 et seq., was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Wheeler v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
- Culley v. Pearl River Industrial CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Board of Greenwood County Comm'rs v. NadelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.