Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schneider v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 19, 1980No. 50,655PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This case involves the constitutionality of tax increment financing of programs designed to redevelop blighted business areas in Kansas cities as authorized by K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 12-1770 et seq. There is no factual dispute. The city of Topeka, by resolution No. 3241, adopted a redevelopment plan for a two-block downtown commercial area. At the same time, the city declared its intent to issue special obligation bonds in the amount of $18,000,000 to finance the redevelopment.

The urban redevelopment act, K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 12-1770 et seq., was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wheeler v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  5. Culley v. Pearl River Industrial CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Board of Greenwood County Comm'rs v. NadelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API