Legal Opinion
Conklin v. City of Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 8, 1902No. 12,297PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from Reno district court; M. P. Simpson, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J. :
By chapter 301, Laws of 1895, the legislature sought to vacate the lots, blocks, streets and alleys of four additions to the city of Hutchinson. Sections 1 and 5 of said chapter read:
“Section 1. That all lots, blocks, streets and alleys in G. O. Millar’s north addition to the city of Hutchinson, Reno county, Kansas, be and the same *583are hereby vacated; and that the fee in such streets and alleys shall revert báck to and be in the owners of such lots and blocks; such real estate being the northwest quarter of section number seven (7), township…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Slauson v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- City of Wyandotte v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. HaneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Levitt v. City of WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- State ex rel. City of Shawano v. EngelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920