Legal Opinion

People v. Nance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1991No. E007995PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the burden of proof borne by a defendant moving to withdraw his plea of guilty pursuant to Penal Code section 1018, prior to pronouncement of judgment, is *1455by the standard of clear and convincing evidence or by a preponderance of the evidence. Finding that the trial court properly denied the motion to withdraw the plea of guilty using the clear and convincing evidence standard of proof, we affirm.

Facts

The defendant was charged in the Bear Valley Justice Court, San Bernardino County, by an amended complaint with one count of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Thornton v. Dennis M.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. CastanedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. People v. HuricksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. In re VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. BreslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API