Legal Opinion

People v. Huricks

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1995No. Docket Nos. B080496, B085033PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUKE, J. *

Introduction

Kevin P. Huricks (Huricks) appeals from the judgment entered following his plea of nolo contendere to six counts of forcible rape, violations of Penal Code section 261, subdivision (a)(2), 1 together with an enhancement allegation that the victim was vulnerable within the meaning of section 667.9, subdivision (a); one count of attempted forcible oral copulation, a violation of sections 664 and 288a, subdivision (c); one count of sexual battery, a violation of section 243.4, subdivision (d); one count of using a minor for sex acts, a violation of section 311.4,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. People v. BreslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. DillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Markosyan v. Superior Court CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API