Legal Opinion
Glen P. Gradall v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 10, 1963No. 4-60PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURFEE, Judge.
This is an action to recover an amount recouped from plaintiff’s retired pay under the limitations on dual compensation of the Economy Act of 1932, as amended. Plaintiff was drawing retirement pay as an Army captain with over 30 years’ service, having been employed by the Army Exchange Service and the Air Force Exchange Service.
This court decided on May 9, 1962 that plaintiff as a retired officer was not exempt from the Economy Act of 1932, and further stated, Gradall v. United States, No. 4-60, Ct.Cl. (decided May 9, 1962 — ■ slip opinion, p. 5):
“ * * * we are not prepared, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Leland K. Aubrey and Charlotte R. Aubrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Pulaski Cab Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Naomi Glushakow Denenberg v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Matthews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- John M. Denkler v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Donaldson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.