Naomi Glushakow Denenberg v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
DURFEE, Judge.
Plaintiff was injured in the course of employment as a civilian employee of the U. S. Navy Exchange (U. S. Navy Ship’s Store Office, U. S. Naval Facility, London, England), a nonappropriated funds activity. She seeks recovery of compensation benefits alleged to be due her under the Act of June 19, 1952, 5 U.S.C.A. §§ 150k and 150k-!, 1 which provides as follows:
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That: civilian employees, compensated from nonappropriated funds, of the Army and Air Force Exchange…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Leland K. Aubrey and Charlotte R. Aubrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wright v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United States of America, Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Glen P. Gradall v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.