Legal Opinion
John M. Denkler v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 28, 1986No. Appeal 85-2306PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a Claims Court decision on cross-motions for summary judgment. The four claimants were regular officers of the Army and Navy, retired for length of service and not for disability who, after such retirement, had taken staff positions with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The appellee United States, with the support of the General Accounting Office (B-212226, Dec. 16, 1983), had determined that as a matter of law the Dual Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5531 and ff. as reenacted in 1964, required that the annuities otherwise…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Otoe and Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Fritz Kyer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Ambassador Division of Florsheim Shoe v. The United States, and Footwear Industries of America, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Glen P. Gradall v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Margaret A. Cheeseman v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Robert W. Kearns, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chrysler Corporation, and American Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Ains, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Furash & Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.