Legal Opinion
Coughlin v. State Bank
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
It is a general rule of law uniformly applied in this country that:
“Where misrepresentations are made to the public at large, or to a particular class of persons, with the intention of influencing any member of the public, or of the class, to whom they may be communicated, any one injured through proper reliance thereon may secure redress. In such a case it is not necessary that there should be an intent to defraud any particular person; but the representation must of course have been intended for the public, or for a particular class of persons to which complainant belonged.
“Under the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ginn v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Lantry v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Thomas v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Earle v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Jones National Bank v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Palmer v. MURDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Higgs v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Palmer v. MURDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1963