Legal Opinion

Lantry v. Wallace

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1901No. 180PublishedCited by 66 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This action was brought by the receiver of the Missouri National Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, under section 5151 of-the Revised- Statutes, providing that the shareholders of every national banking association shall be held individually responsible, equally and ratably, and not one for another, for all contracts, debts and engagements of such association, to the amount of their stock therein, at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in such shares.

The case was determined in the Circuit Court upon demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of the defendant Lantry, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Oppenheimer v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Alsop v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API