Legal Opinion

Palmer v. MURDOCK

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action for personal injuries and property damages resulting from a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and defendants’ truck. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit entered after plaintiff had made his opening statement and before he had introduced any evidence.

The collision occurred at the intersection of Fifth avenue and Lincoln street in Eugene, Oregon. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged various specifications of negligence on the part of defendant and further alleged that defendant had the last clear chance to avoid the injury. In his opening statement counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Goodson v. SchwandtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Lane v. Portland Ry., Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Coughlin v. State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. United States Employers Council, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Sadler v. Sisters of Charity of Providence in Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bailey v. MeadOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Beck v. AicheleOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Goff v. Radi, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API