Legal Opinion

Palmer v. MURDOCK

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1963Published

1Opinion of the Court

233 Or. 334 (1963)

378 P.2d 271

PALMER

v.

MURDOCK ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued December 6, 1962.

Reversed and remanded January 23, 1963.

Petition for rehearing denied February 13, 1963.

Kenneth A. Morrow, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Venn, Mulder & Morrow, Eugene.

James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf and Wayne Hilliard, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, LUSK and DENECKE, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action for…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Lusk; Concurrence · McALLISTER.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Goodson v. SchwandtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Palmer v. MURDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Lane v. Portland Ry., Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Coughlin v. State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API