Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Nielson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1926No. Docket No. 5550PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

The plaintiffs, who constitute the majority in number and in ownership of stock of the stockholders of the Diamond Laundry Company, a corporation, commenced this action under the provisions of section 315 of the Civil Code, to determine the validity of an election of directors of the corporation held on March 5, 1924. The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that three of their number were elected directors at said meeting, but that defendant Collopy, claiming to act under a written proxy from one of the plaintiffs, voted his stock at said meeting, and that three of the defendants thereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistristCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Dougherty v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Bailey v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Centrifugal National Concentrator Co. v. EcclestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API