Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. Immler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1963No. [No. 14, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.

This appeal brings up the question whether the Maryland statute dealing with the licensing of architects bars a plaintiff, who is not a licensed architect, from recovering as a third party beneficiary for architectural services rendered by him to a property owner under a contract between the latter and a licensed architect which required the licensed architect to employ the plaintiff’s services. The plaintiff, DeLos V. Snodgrass, took this appeal when the Circuit Court for Montgomery County found against him and entered a judgment for costs in favor of the defendants, George A. Kolstad, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schloss v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Goldsmith v. Manufacturers' Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  4. Pitts v. State Board of Examiners of PsychologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Binford v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Golt v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Harry Berenter, Inc. v. BermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Thorpe v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Finch v. LVNV Funding LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API