General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
In Equity. Demurrer to amended bill of complaint on grounds, first, that complainant has a full, complete, and adequate remedy at law, and, second, that complainant’s alleged cause of action is not cognizable in equity.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The decision of this court on the argument of the demurrer to the original bill of complaint herein is found in 144 Fed. 458. The question is whether or not complainant has now stated facts which, admitted to be true, entitle him to relief in equity. The facts alleged may be summarized as follows:(1) Complainant, or General Company, is a New York corporation;, defendant, or Westinghouse, is a Pennsylvania corporation.(2) About March 31, 1896, said corporations entered into a written contract, by its terms to continue and be in force for 15 years, and which has not been…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- National Marking MacH. Co. v. Triumph Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Universal Rim Co. v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922
- Montgomery Light & Power Co. v. Montgomery Traction Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.