Edwards v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShawn A. Womack, Justice
|fiI concur with the majority’s opinion affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of Edwards’s habeas petition; I respectfully dissent solely on the majority’s analysis of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-68-607 (Repl. 2005). As the majority noted, the statute prevents an indigent incarcerated person from bringing a civil action or appealing from such a proceeding if he has previously brought three or more meritless claims. In Watts v. Kelley we held that, based on our constitution, a habeas petition could not count as a “strike” under the statute. 2017 Ark. 189, at 4, 520 S.W.3d 249, 252. Watts controls…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Love v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Renshaw v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Tucker v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.