Legal Opinion

Renshaw v. Norris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1999No. CR 97-1074PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellant, Sherman Dale Renshaw, brings this writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is being illegally detained pursuant to a sentence longer than that authorized by statute. Upon conviction of three felonies, appellant was sentenced on July 26, 1989, to a total of fifty years’ imprisonment. A judgment and commitment order was filed sentencing appellant to fifty years for possession of a schedule II narcotic, a class Y felony; to thirty years for possession of a schedule II stimulant, a class B felony; and to ten years for possession of drug paraphernalia, a class C…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. MacKey v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Bangs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Ex Parte HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Flowers v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Hobbs v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Cloird v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API