Legal Opinion

Slavsky v. New York City Police Department

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1997No. 96 Civil 6800(JGK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELTL, District Judge:

OPINION AND ORDER

The plaintiffs, Samuel and Edward Slav-sky, retired as New York City police officers and were subsequently employed by the New York City Board of Education. Section 1117 of the New York City Charter prevents them from receiving their police pensions while simultaneously receiving compensation for employment by New York State or New York City. The plaintiffs have sued New York City and the Police Pension Fund under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants acting under color of state law have denied to them their constitutional rights to equal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Connolly v. MccallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Connolly v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. United States ex rel. Phipps v. Comprehensive Community Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Cowan v. Ernest Codelia, PCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Stoianoff v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API