Legal Opinion
Stoianoff v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 4, 2000No. 97 CIV. 7226 CMPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
McMAHON, District Judge.
Defendant, Richard E. Jackson, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (“Commissioner Jackson”) moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for an order dismissing plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) in its entirety. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
Plaintiff pro se, Carroll B. Stoianoff (“plaintiff’ or “Stoianoff’), brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The gravamen of plaintiffs complaint is that,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Logan v. MatveevskiiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Schwier v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Schmitt v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Arakawa v. SakataDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
- Schmitt v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.