Legal Opinion

Urich v. Fish

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 13, 2000No. AC 18334PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPALLONE, J.

The plaintiff, Mark S. Urich, sought damages from the defendant, Richard Fish, for the defendant’s alleged breach of a contract to purchase a *178yacht from the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that there remained due a $20,000 balance of the purchase price. The defendant filed a counterclaim alleging that certain equipment was missing from the boat when he took delivery. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff on the complaint and for the defendant on the counterclaim. The plaintiff appeals, claiming that the trial court improperly (1) rendered judgment for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Winick v. WinickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. Thermoglaze, Inc. v. Morningside Gardens Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Urich v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Houghtaling v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. U.S. Bank National Assn. v. RagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API