State Ex Rel. Hobart Mfg. Co. v. Blake
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.
The relator claims that the respondents, under the facts, were without jurisdiction to make an order awarding compensation to Fischer for total disability based upon the occupational disease of silicosis when, as it claims, the undisputed facts show that silicosis was only one of several causes of total disability, and that for that reason its award was illegal and void. See State, ex rel. Yuska, v. Industrial Commission, 144 Ohio St., 187, 58 N. E. (2d), 214.
The function of the extraordinary remedy of prohibition is to prevent a judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal from assuming jurisdiction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Burtzlaff v. VickeryOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Maysville Bridge Co. v. QuinlanOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Moss v. ClairOhio Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Cleveland Co-Operative Stove Co. v. CoffinberryOhio Supreme Court · 1948