Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Maysville Bridge Co. v. Quinlan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1931No. 23128PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court find that there is no warrant for the issuance of a writ of prohibition sought by the plaintiff, for the reason that the action, order and judgment which the plaintiff seeks to have restrained and prohibited have been fully consummated. A writ of prohibition may be awarded only to prevent' the unlawful usurpation of jurisdiction, and does not lie to prevent the enforcement of a claimed erroneous judgment previously rendered; it may be invoked only to prevent proceeding in a matter in which there is an absence of jurisdiction and not to review the regularity of an act already…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stefanick v. Municipal Court of MariettaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Young v. MorrowOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Moss v. ClairOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Hughes v. CramerOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Relyea v. SchoonmakerOhio Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API