State Ex Rel. Maysville Bridge Co. v. Quinlan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The court find that there is no warrant for the issuance of a writ of prohibition sought by the plaintiff, for the reason that the action, order and judgment which the plaintiff seeks to have restrained and prohibited have been fully consummated. A writ of prohibition may be awarded only to prevent' the unlawful usurpation of jurisdiction, and does not lie to prevent the enforcement of a claimed erroneous judgment previously rendered; it may be invoked only to prevent proceeding in a matter in which there is an absence of jurisdiction and not to review the regularity of an act already…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Stefanick v. Municipal Court of MariettaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Young v. MorrowOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Moss v. ClairOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Hughes v. CramerOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Relyea v. SchoonmakerOhio Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.