Legal Opinion

Tyndall v. Triangle Mobile Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The motion to vacate the judgment was based on factual allegations which, if established, would compel the court to grant *469defendant an opportunity to be heard on the question of liability to plaintiff. Plaintiff’s denial of the facts stated in defendant’s motion presented a question of fact to be decided by the court. Menzel v. Menzel, 250 N.C. 649, 110 S.E. 2d 333; Harrington v. Rice, 245 N.C. 640, 97 S.E. 2d 239; Banks v. Lane, 171 N.C. 505, 88 S.E. 754; Simmons v. Box Co., 148 N.C. 344, 62 S.E. 435.

Both the judge presiding over the Municipal-County Court and the judge presiding over the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Harrington v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. St. George v. HansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parris v. Garner Commercial Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Sun Bank/South Florida v. TracyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API