City of Troy v. McLendon
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
This is a personal injury case. The defendant, City of Troy, brings this appeal from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff (A). The question presented is whether there was an entire change of parties defendant, thereby bringing about a discontinuance. The trial court held that there was not, and we agree.
Stated succinctly, the case is this:
A, an employee of the City, was injured when B’s automobile ran into a steel cable being placed by the City’s employees across a street. This caused the cable to strike A, resulting in the injuries complained of. A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roth v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Ewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Copeland v. Dixie Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Alabama Power Co. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Richardson v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Troy v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966