Legal Opinion

City of Troy v. McLendon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1966No. 4 Div. 156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

On appellee’s petition, this case (City of Troy v. McLendon, 278 Ala. 704, 180 So.2d 538) was placed on the rehearing docket on December 27, 1965, for the limited purpose of determining whether it was error not to include in the judgment of affirmance (rendered October 21, 1965, and rehearing denied December 9, 1965) the 10% damages provided for by Code 1940, Tit. 7, ,§ 814, as amended by Act No. 724, appvd. Sept. 5, 1951, Acts 1951, Vol. II, pp. 1275-1276. The pertinent part of amended § 814 is as follows:

“When a judgment or decree is render-' ed for money,, whether debt or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. City of Decatur v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. City of Anniston v. HillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. City of Birmingham v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. City of Birmingham v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bevelon D. Locke v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API