Woodward v. Superior Court of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. The fact are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition commanding the respondent to refrain from further proceedings upon an order which has been made-appointing a receiver in the case of Woodward et al. v. Raum et al., and authorizing him to sell an undivided interest in the property.
The petition shows that the petitioner and Mary 0». Raum, Helen J. Hutchinson, and Sarah B. Melone, were,, on the 11th of February, 1888, the owners of certains real estate in the city of San Francisco, and known as-Woodward’s Gardens, and that on said day, petitioner;, and Mary 0. Raum, Ely I. Hutchinson, and Sarah…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Clark v. Superior Court of Lassen CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Daniel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Murphy v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Dahlgren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Mines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Westwood Temple v. Emanuel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ryer v. Fletcher Ryer Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.