Legal Opinion

Bowl-O-Beauty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 4, 1975No. Court Nos. R70/8993, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

In these appeals for reappraisement, consolidated for trial, plaintiff contends that the appraised export values1 of merchandise exported from Hong Kong and appraised at Chicago, provenly include a non-dutiable buying commission.2 Plaintiff, in argument, relies on the separable appraisement doctrine to narrow the issue to the question of buying commission.3 If the appraisements in these consolidated cases are not separable, and as a result there is insufficient proof for the court to find that the appraised export values include a specified amount as a commission considered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. United States v. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. United States v. Shalom & Co.United States Customs Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. Strombecker Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API