Whitehead v. Rosalyn Strauss & Pacific Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIELSEN, District Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of thé District Court affirming the order and judgment of the Bankruptcy Court in which it concluded that the claim of appellees had not been discharged in appellant’s bankruptcy. For the reasons stated below, the Bankruptcy Court correctly construed the relevant statute, and there was no abuse of discretion. Therefore, we affirm.
On September 10, 1973, petitioner-appellant, Malissa Alberta Meeks Whitehead, was involved in an automobile accident with Rosalyn Strauss, respondent-appellee. At the time of the accident appellant had no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Mills v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Phoenix of Hartford Insurance v. Colony KitchensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitehead v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978