Legal Opinion
Aspinwall v. Herrin
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided December 27, 1994No. Civ. A. 293-6PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, Senior District Judge.
On January 12, 1993, Plaintiffs brought this federal question action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants, David Herrin (“Herrin”) and Kenny Poppell (“Poppell”), in both their individual and official capacities. Plaintiffs are former and current Wayne County Deputy Sheriffs who claim they were wrongfully terminated from their jobs by Herrin when he became Sheriff of Wayne County. Herrin is the Sheriff of Wayne County and Poppell is a deputy sheriff.
Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides a civil action for persons claiming violations of their rights secured by…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Harter v. VernonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Allen v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Calvert v. HicksDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007