Legal Opinion

Bullard v. California State Automobile Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2005No. C047317PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.

On June 16, 2002, plaintiffs Lee Allan and Nina Bullard (the Bullards) were injured in a rear-end collision. The driver of the pickup truck that struck their car was uninsured. The trial court denied the Bullards’ petition to compel defendant California State Automobile Association (CSAA) to arbitrate the claim under the Bullards’ uninsured motorist policy, concluding, among other things, that the petition was untimely under the provisions of Insurance Code section 11580.2 applicable at the time.

On appeal, the Bullards argue they are entitled to reversal because: (1)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michael v. HowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Barber v. Cal. State Pers. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Redrock Administrative Services LLC v. Magna Entertainment Corp. (In Re Magna Entertainment Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Barber v. CA State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Dickerson v. Contra Costa CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API