Legal Opinion

Barber v. Cal. State Pers. Bd.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 17, 2019No. E068719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODRINGTON J.

*504I.

INTRODUCTION

This is plaintiff and appellant Patrick Barber's second appeal in this case and raises an issue of first impression.1 Upon remand from Barber's first appeal ( Barber I ) , defendant and respondent, the California State Personnel Board *505(SPB), awarded Barber a lump sum back pay award, which resulted in Barber incurring increased income tax liability. SPB denied Barber's motion for recovery for increased tax liability. The trial court upheld SPB's decision and denied Barber's petition for writ of mandamus. Barber appeals the denial of his writ petition and motion for…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Commissioner v. SchleierSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CIM Urban REIT 211 Main Street (SF) v. City and County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. CIM Urban REIT 211 Main Street (SF) v. City and County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Guillermo v. Los Angeles County Dept. etc. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Rodgers v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API