Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. Contra Costa County
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 9, 2023No. 4:22-cv-03375Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JERMAINE DEMEL DICKERSON, Case No. 22-cv-03375-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 13 10 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Contra Costa 14 County and David E. Goldstein. Dkt. No. 13. The Court finds this matter appropriate for 15 disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For 16 the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. 17 I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.