Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Routzahn

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 20, 2013No. Civ. No. 08-3479 PJMPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.

Rodney Wolfe sued two Washington County sheriffs, Thomas Routzahn and Joel Footen (collectively, “Defendants”), for using excessive force when they arrested him, in violation of his rights pursuant to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.1 After a six-day trial, a jury found that Routzahn applied excessive force, but that Footen did not. It awarded Wolfe no damages.

Pending before the Court are four motions:

• Routzahn’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (Paper No. 130);

• Wolfe’s Motion for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corral v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  2. Chasrick Heredia v. Michael Roscoe et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
  3. Carol P. Taylor et al. v. Prince George’s County, Maryland et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  4. Dewitt v. RitzDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  5. Heredia v. RoscoeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API