Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Dickey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1878PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Calhoun. Assumpsit on bond. Plaintiff recovered below and defendants bring error. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiffs in error were sued as sureties on Averill’s bond as administrator of the estate of William H. Gage, deceased; and the breach alleged was the failure to account for the purchase price of lands sold’ for the estate. The undisputed facts showed that the sale was made to Daniel W. Green, the surviving partner of Gage, and .the theory of the defense below was that the object of the sale was to transfer to him the legal title of lands which equitably belonged to the partnership, to be used in settling the business.

The case rests on facts entirely undisputed, and shows that the only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barry v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Moran v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Easton v. CourtwrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Johnson v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Frankfort Marine Accident and Plate Glass Insurance Co. v. California Artistic Metal and Wire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API